Posts Tagged ‘Islam’

I’m proud to say this photo I took of Greg and Michael kissing in front of the Muslim protestors at the Global Atheist Conference last weekend received almost 250 000 views within less than 24 hrs of being posted on Sunday/Monday.

It’s been spammed all over Facebook and Reddit, as well as even appear in online news articles. Nice job guys! This is the kind of thing that people care about, and it’s nice to see that’s still the case.


Read Full Post »

(Some of the following is reposted from Maryam Namazie’s blog.)

Young members of the Worker-communist Party of Iran who live in Iran have joined the scream! Since they would be executed for this act, their faces are covered with slogans saying ‘Long Live Women’s Freedom’, ‘No to Hejab’, ‘No to Islamic Reaction’, and ‘No to Gender Discrimination’. They have printed the calendar and pasted it behind them. This photo has made my day.

I’m a strong proponent of women’s rights, especially in counties like Iran where women are treated more like belongings than individual human beings. So seeing these people taking part in this project is heartwarming to say the least. Power to them!

Anyone is able to take part in this Nude Photo Revolutionary Calendar. Below is a brief description of the project:

Today – 8 March 2012 International Women’s Day – the Nude Photo Revolutionaries Calendar is being launched in homage to Egyptian atheist, student and blogger Aliaa Magda Elmahdy who posted a nude photo of herself, announcing the post on Twitter under the hashtag, #NudePhotoRevolutionary.

The calendar is the idea of campaigner Maryam Namazie to support Aliaa Magda Elmahdy and join her ‘screams against a society of violence, racism, sexism, sexual harassment and hypocrisy’.

Read Full Post »

Read Full Post »

A 30-year-old civil servant named Alexander An may face prison time simply for coming out on Facebook as an atheist and stating, “God doesn’t exist.”

He was apparently have an argument with other locals from his town on Facebook about religion, and later dozens of locals stormed into his place of work and bashed him. What’s even worse is that the police showed up and arrested him!?

He now faces trial for “suspicion of blasphemy against Islam,” and faces a jail term of up to 5-years.

I find it abysmal and disgusting that any country have anti-blasphemy laws. To me it seems completely contradictory. To put laws in place in order to protect your God from mere words, as if he can’t protect himself, should surely be seen as blasphemous in and of itself!? Moreover, the fact that you think you have to protect your religion by law from blasphemy kind of discredits the validity of your religion, not to mention suggests you have some serious insecurities about your faith as well.

Meanwhile, the religious in Indonesia will hold demonstrations asking for their religious freedom to be respected. I think if you want to have freedom of religion, you should also be able to have freedom from religion.

The Western World needs to start offering asylum to people who are persecuted for being atheists, such as Alexander An. If these countries don’t want rational, clear thinking individuals, then we’ll bloody take them! Maybe we should start a campaign for ‘Adopting Atheist Blasphemers‘?

Read Full Post »

So I’ve had my first email/message from a Muslim. It wasn’t abusive, but it was offensive in so much as I lost 2 minutes of my evening reading this babble… Forgive me for posting it as if you’re reading this now you’re probably about to waste a few minutes of your life on it as well.

All perfect praise be to Allah, The Lord of the Worlds. I testify that there is none worthy of worship except Allah, and that Muhammad is His slave and Messenger. We ask Allah to exalt his mention as well as that of his family and all his companions.

The claim of this man that he does not believe except in what he sees is wrong and he is the first one to deny this himself. He believes in many things that he does not see but only sees their impact. For instance, he believes in the gravity but does not see except its effect, and believes in the electric current but does not see except its impact and so on. Therefore, a person who ponders upon the world around him knows that this universe has a Creator. Allah says (which means): {We will show them Our Signs in the universe, and in their own selves, until it becomes manifest to them that this (the Qur’an) is the truth. Is it not sufficient in regard to your Lord that He is a witness over all things?}[41:53]. It is impossible to believe that something exists by itself without someone having created it or made it. A person who ponders over the modern inventions would know that it is impossible for them to exist by chance. So if this is impossible, how can it be possible for us to believe that this world with all its precision, system and order exists without a Creator; a Creator who is Perfect from all deficiencies and imperfections? Allah says (which means): {Were they created by nothing? Or were they themselves the creators? Or did they create the heavens and the earth? Nay, but they have no firm belief.}[52:35-36]. In addition to this, every creature has a natural predisposition to believe in his Creator, and he is in need of Allah and in need to return to him at times of difficulties and hardship no matter what his current inclination may be. Allah says (which means): {And when they board a ship, they supplicate Allah, sincere to Him in religion [i.e. faith and hope]. But when He delivers them to the land, at once they associate others with Him.}[29:65]. Claiming that the reason of development is disbelief in Allah and His religion, is a wrong claim that has no foundation. On the contrary Islamic religion advocates progress in all fields that are important in our worldly life and in our religion and the Muslims did not deteriorate except when they neglected their religion and abandoned a good part of the message that was sent to them. It is indeed wrong to believe that the situation of the Muslims today accurately reflects the importance of Islam. So if a person wants to judge with justice he has to look to the first generation and the generation after it when the nations of the world were under Muslim rule. The western countries and others did not develope in industry and in other important innovations until they utilized the sciences developed by Muslims many years ago.

The testimonies of the just western people testify to this. Moreover, the atheists and non-Muslims have not reached this technological progress because of disbelief and abandoning the Religion of Allah. But they have reached this status because of their effort in reaching and obtaining the utmost of this worldly life. Allah says (which means): {Whoever desires the life of this world and its adornments — We fully repay them for their deeds therein, and they therein will not be deprived. Those are the ones for whom there is not in the Hereafter but the Fire. And of no effect is that which they used to do.}[11:15-16].

Allah knows best.

They’re going to have to try a little harder than that to convert me unfortunately. I couldn’t be bothered replying with anything more than the following:

You have the ability to learn more than you could ever imagine sitting no further than at the edge of your finger tips. Countless answers about the universe await you here, http://www.google.com.au/ Truth is in your grasp, don’t waste it.

UPDATE: I got a reply…

This person’s clearly just copying and pasting text to me, as within a minute of my reply to him I received this:

“My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior Spirit who reveals Himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble minds. That deeply emotional conviction of the presence of a superior reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God.” — EINSTEIN

There is a grandeur in this view of life with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being evolved.” — DARWIN


I know, I know… I shouldn’t get sucked in and reply. As soon as you give these loonies the privilege of a response you give the poor souls the idea that they have something to stand on with regards to their opinion. But I couldn’t help myself, and actually wanted to look into and refresh in my own mind the exact meaning behind those quotes. And so I retorted:

Einstein’s quote actually reads as:

“My religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit who reveals himself in the slight details we are able to perceive with our frail and feeble minds. That deeply emotional conviction of the presence of a superior reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible universe, forms my idea of God.”

No “Himself” or “Spirit”, he didn’t believe in a god, any god, let alone YOUR god allah…

Einstein said this in a letter dated in March, 1954:

“It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it.” – Einstein

We KNOW that Darwin was an agnostic from his mouth too:

“The mystery of the beginning of all things is insoluble by us; and I for one must be content to remain an agnostic.” – Darwin

A more plausible explanation as to why Darwin wanted to leave the specific correlation between God and the beginning of life unanswered (by using the word Creator as in the above quote), was so that those who believed in God could follow their beliefs, and those who did not could follow theirs. So as an agnostic, who was at best a deist believing that a deity may have started the ball moving but nothing more when it came to the universe, he didn’t want to choose one side or the other and offend people by his agnosticism (hence Darwin’s Bulldog Thomas Huxley did the debating for him in public (he was an atheist)).


Read Full Post »

I’m just going to repost this story as it is via this link to the New Humanist webpage. It’s a huge shame that there are such violent and aggressive people ruining otherwise peaceful debates/events such as this one simply because they regard religion. I wonder when and if such islamic aggression will reach our shores here in Australia, as it already has the US and Europe.

Yesterday evening, a talk on “Sharia Law and Human Rights” organised by the Atheism, Secularism and Humanism Society at Queen Mary, University London, had to be cancelled after threats of violence. The talk was due to be given by Anne Marie Waters of the One Law For All campaign, which campaigns against the use of Sharia in the UK.

The president of the society describes what happened:

“Five minutes before the talk was due to start a man burst into the room holding a camera phone and for some seconds stood filming the faces of all those in the room. He shouted ‘listen up all of you, I am recording this, I have your faces on film now, and I know where some of you live’, at that moment he aggressively pushed the phone in someone’s face and then said ‘and if I hear that anything is said against the holy Prophet Muhammad, I will hunt you down.’ He then left the room and two members of the audience applauded.

“The same man then began filming the faces of Society members in the foyer and threatening to hunt them down if anything was said about Muhammad, he added that he knew where they lived and would murder them and their families. On leaving the building, he joined a large group of men, seemingly there to support him. We were told by security to stay in the Lecture Theatre for our own safety. On arriving back in the room I became aware that the doors that opened to the outside were still open and that people were still coming in. Several eye witnesses reported that when I was in the foyer a group of men came through the open doors, causing a disruption and making it clear that the room could not be secured. Unfortunately, the lack of security in the lecture theatre meant we and the audience had to leave and a Union representative informed the security that as students’ lives had been threatened there was no way that the talk could go ahead.
“This event was supposed to be an opportunity for people of different religions and perspectives to debate, at a university that is supposed to be a beacon of free speech and debate. Only two complaints had been made to the Union prior to the event, and the majority of the Muslim students at the event were incredibly supportive of it going ahead. These threats were an aggressive assault on freedom of speech and the fact that they led to the cancellation of our talk was severely disappointing for all of the religious and non-religious students in the room who wanted to engage in debate.”
The police were contacted about the incident and the Society is waiting to hear how their investigation will proceed.Jenny Bartle, president of the National Federation of Atheist, Humanist and Secular Student Societies (AHS), commented:

“More and more atheist, humanist and secular student societies are forming on campuses across the UK and we deserve the same levels of respect as any other community. Our members have as much right as anyone else to participate in the free inquiry, discussion and debate which should exist in universities. The threats our members have received are both troubling and repugnant and we reject all attempts to counter debate with violence. At the same time, we welcome the support from across faiths that many of our societies experience on campus to help us secure the freedom to have our say, just as we support them in having the freedom to have theirs.”
 Andrew Copson, Chief Executive of the British Humanist Association gave support to the society:
“The attempted intimidation that this society has experienced is shocking. Free expression, the free exchange of ideas and free debate are hallmarks of an open society; violence and the threat of violence should never be allowed to compromise that, especially in our universities. We will work to support our affiliate society at Queen Mary’s and look forward to a speedy police investigation and resolution of this case.”

Read Full Post »

According to a recent article in Now Lebanon an Egyptian muslim leader, Salafist Sheikh, has concluded and announced that women’s faces should effectively be treated like vaginas when it comes to being covered:

What is a veil? A veil is what covers the woman’s face. Therefore the woman’s face is like her vagina.

What claptrap. This kind of ultra-conservative attitude just perpetuates the needless separatism between the sexes, as well as shame and oppression of sexuality. Body parts are only as taboo as any given society or culture deems them to be. Native Australians and Africans for innumerable centuries donned little more than a mammal skin around their waist at the best of times, yet remained cohesive societies that survived through millennia after millennia. Until modern day conservative Christian missionaries force fed them Adam’s apple, bestowing upon them the unnecessary shame and insecurity they so proudly carry and proselytise.

I find it hard to believe these ancient and more apparel-relaxed peoples would have persisted for as long as they did if each and every man surged with an unquenchable thirst for rape and violence anytime he spotted a woman’s hair, neck, face, or breast (God forbid).

It’s just one more sexist and dogmatic meme that allows religious societies, and more specifically the men within them, to control the sexuality of the ‘lower’ sex, not to mention their own insecurities and fears.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »